Switch to: graphics version | print version


2.Main Content

2003 ADR in Ombudsman schemes

This page contains an outline of this research, and a summary of the key findings. Details of how to find the full report can be found at the bottom of the page.
 
Title
“The Use of ADR in Ombudsman Processes: Results of a survey of members of the British and Irish Ombudsman Association”
 
What is it?
The paper is a compilation of the results of a survey of ombudsmen and independent complaints handlers. The aim of the survey was to determine what alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes are being used by ombudsmen and to contribute to the development of good practice advice for ombudsmen.
 
Who did it?
The survey was conducted by Margaret Doyle and was published on the British and Irish Ombudsman Association (BIOA) website in March 2003. It involved a questionnaire sent to BIOA member organisations. The number surveyed was small (17 out of 39 responded); however, some general conclusions can be drawn.
 
Key findings
The author welcomes the use of ADR by ombudsmen if it serves the interests of four key stakeholders:

However, a number of concerns were raised, in particular:

The survey also found that definitions of the various ADR processes are needed, as ombudsmen use the terms in different ways. For example, many ombudsmen refer to their informal resolution process as “mediation”. However, mediation allows the parties to reach their own, mutually agreed settlement. In informal resolution it is the ombudsman who determines whether a settlement is appropriate, and what the terms of the settlement should be.
 
Among the other key findings of the survey are:


 
The full report can be found here: ADR in ombudsman schemes.
 

End of Section Back to top


3.Related Content

Site Information

Also in ADR Research

Related Information

Ombudsmen
An ombudsmen overview

End of Section Back to top